21st century
GLOBAL DYNAMICS

a MELLICHAMP RESEARCH INITIATIVE
Our research cluster analyzes the specific features of contemporary globalization, emphasizing the social forces, fields, and trajectories that are shaping our world today.

Areas of Research

Gender and Islam research area image
Gender & Islam
human rights protest sign
Human Rights
Media and culture research area image
Media & Culture
Political economy research area image
Political Economy

Spotlight

  • roundtable participants
    EventsJanuary 2020
    Mellichamp Professor Alison Brysk hosts a workshop asking the questions, 'What are the common patterns and national distinctions of the worldwide wave of nationalist violence?', and 'How can we contest these patterns and reconfigure the international rights regime and democratic institutions to address them?'
  • PublicationsJanuary 2020
    A new essay collection, edited by Global Dynamics Initiative members Victor Faessel and Michael Curtin together with Richard Falk, gathers a wide range of perspectives on reviving public imagination in a time of worldwide populist politics, nationalist resurgence, and climate crisis.
  • Globalization & Culture (4th edn.) cover
    PublicationsMay 2019
    In this seminal text, Mellichamp Professor Jan Nederveen Pieterse disputes the view that we are experiencing a “clash of civilizations” as well as the idea that globalization leads to cultural homogenization, arguing instead that we are witnessing the formation of a global mélange culture through processes of cultural mixing or hybridization.

global-e

a global studies journal

Donald Trump holding up his arms at public address in gesture of holding a rifle
June 30, 2020

Supporters of Teflon politicians do not focus on how tenable are their arguments, nor on how sound are their policies, or on how conducive they are to the community’s wellbeing. [T]he Teflon effect shows that, lately, claims in the name of the ethical sense do not “stick.” [...] There are many hypotheses about why so many voters knowingly choose an untenable position at the polls. However, most agree that there are structural reasons why voters are willing to take such risks.